![]() |
this represents Bangkok as well as anything else |
I'm back! Not really feeling 100% just yet, but I'm definitely back in Bangkok. I've got jet lag and shingles, not a good combination, but it's fine.
Thinking more about that last writing on spending a month in Honolulu I left out a couple of things, about transitioning, about jet lag and culture shock. I can add that here, and then list out what I like more about Bangkok / Thailand than Honolulu / Hawaii. It's so nice there that it's odd that some parts are actually better here, or that an overall feeling of being in place works out better, which I'll explain.
jet lag: lots of people are very familiar with this, but some might not be. An hour or two of time difference is fine, when traveling, but after 3 or 4 it requires some adjustment. Hawaii is 7 hours ahead of here, or really it's 17 hours ahead here, so they're both kind of on different days.
They say that it takes one day to get over one hour of shift, and that it scales up the same way, so a 7 hour time difference should take a week to adjust to. Maybe that's about right; it's hard to say. It takes awhile. There isn't much more to say about how that goes; you end up awake at night, and napping during the day, and a bit tired off and on. Traveling one direction really is easier than the other, but I've lost track of which way that is. Maybe going east is harder. Google's AI take on this:
Jet lag is generally harder when traveling east because the body's circadian rhythm has a natural tendency to be slightly longer than 24 hours, making it harder to shorten the day by advancing the body clock. This means your internal clock struggles more to adjust to an earlier schedule, leading to greater fatigue, confusion, and other symptoms compared to the phase delay experienced when traveling west.
I did just switch right back to sleeping at a normal time this past weekend, coming West to Bangkok, and it did take about a week to get that to work out in Honolulu. It also seems that the less well-established your sleep is to begin with the better, because you just have a messed up sleep cycle in both places, so that less changes. I was working in the evening back there (remotely, based from a company in Thailand) so my sleep wasn't consistent, related to often going to sleep well after midnight and waking up at 6 with the kids, then napping to fill in the gaps.
This adds tangent after tangent, but it's nice having jet lag there, initially, because I can run in the mornings, when my normal daily rhythm is such that I'm no good for any morning exercise.
culture shock: it's funny how it takes a week or two for me to feel more integrated back in Honolulu, and here in Bangkok it's relatively automatic. I guess that I have lived here for 18 years, and have only spent 2 or 3 months there at a time, at the most, on and off.
It would be nice if I could describe how that feels more clearly, back there. It's just a little strange, like everything isn't completely real. You really don't get the same effect when vacation traveling. That seems to be a different role, as if being a visitor anywhere isn't problematic, when the point is only to be a temporary visitor. It's not as if I have a problem "doing" an American culture based persona or perspective; I never really switch out of that back in Bangkok. Societies and cultures everywhere have modernized over the last 30 years or so, so things are much more uniform all over than they were before that. It's also not that Honolulu isn't familiar; I last lived there for 2 years in grad school in the US, and that was my 5th stay there in the last 3 years.
It's about the people seeming different, more than the settings. You see a half dozen different main types of people in Honolulu, like tourists from the US mainland, tourists from Asia, Asian or mixed-race locals, homeless people, and so on. Then there are neighbors, school contacts, retail workers to talk to, etc. I interact with people based on these roles and forms.
I suppose lots of other minor inputs add up to the rest. The bus transportation system is different, the things you buy aren't the same, and the places you buy them in, and foods change over. Chinatown is a little closer to here in theme (in Bangkok, where I am again), but culture shock wouldn't be different there, since it's still different enough. People speaking English is easy to appreciate, but also easy to sort of overlook. If people only speak Thai here I catch a decent amount of that, and speak back a very limited and badly pronounced version of it. That part is much easier there, but the harder version here seems normal now.
these old style markets should be hard to adjust to, but they're not, at this point |
you get a great price on lots of types of pineapple in a place like this |
a very familiar version, our favorite place to buy fried chicken and sticky rice |
weather: there is no adjustment going there, because the weather is perfect, 70-some degrees (in the mid 20s C), sunny, and breezy. Here I sweat a good bit more for a few days and then it just seems normal.
It gets overstated how hot Bangkok is. It's hot, and the hot season is completely unbearable, but you adjust to it being in the low 90s (F; in the 30s C) a lot of the time, and being humid. It's worse for visitors, because adjusting takes weeks to months. But locals only feel like they're dying from it a couple of months a year, at the peak. We sleep in air conditioning here, and of course offices are air conditioned, so some conditions are the same everywhere. It's great that they have an open air mall there, Ala Moana, that's perfectly at room temperature all the time, but then it just matches air conditioned mall temperatures here.
people: I didn't mention how people differ in that last post. In a city like Honolulu people are really a bit diverse to be generalizing them as all one type. In general locals are really nice, but transplants or temporary stay locals are just like they are in the mainland, however that happens to be.
If you are white many of the most local locals aren't so interested in experiencing contact with you, and I kind of get that. A few give everyone else a bad name. They would probably experience just as many problems with the worst of the more local locals as well, but might not think through how parallel that really is. The worst tourists are doing some pretty stupid things, and are annoying, but the worst Oahu locals aren't better.
Thais are very nice, but that can mean different things. The main thing that it means is that they're superficially pleasant, which is only so significant. It's a cultural norm to be like that, to smile a lot, and to remain calm. It's mostly genuine; they really do feel calm, mostly. But a smile can mean they disagree with something that they've heard. It helps to be able to read different kinds of smiles.
my favorite Thai smile |
both kids, way back when |
Wouldn't anywhere be more pleasant if people actually tried to be pleasant? Sure, why not? It's sort of nice that Americans show you exactly what they are experiencing just then, in general, but they sort of don't need to tell you all of it, as people tend to. If there's a point to it they should. If it's just venting, or that they have no internal filter, then that's not ideal.
I've really appreciated having nice neighbors in Hawaii, but then we just had a conflict with one not long ago, the first time I remember ever having a conflict with a neighbor (anywhere, over a very long span of time; strange). They said that we were staring in the window at them, which wasn't accurate. I think that neighbor had been smoking too much weed for too long, which is normal there. It probably didn't help that we felt kind of a strange vibe from them from early on, and never really established any connection, as we had with half the other neighbors. Then the others we really never spoke with didn't seem to take that in any negative way; it's a normal thing in the US, to not talk to your neighbors.
Here in Bangkok my wife doesn't like the motorcycle taxi drivers in our soi (alley) drinking in the alley in the evenings. I don't mind; it's up to them. That doesn't work out in the US, since it's not really legal, but here people do whatever they do.
It's funny how the US is the "land of freedoms" but they protect common interests in so many ways that you are more restricted there. Which is fair; noise laws help people sleep at night, and if you are living next to someone blaring Thai country music you'd wish there was more protection related to that. If Americans could openly drink in any given alley it would get out of hand. Maybe the music those "motorsai" guys play is already a bit much, but again to me it's fine. We hear it, but it's not loud at that distance. Out in the Thai countryside people can set up concert power level speaker systems so that at nearly 1 km away people hear it; that's something else.
That's just one example. The roads are a bit chaotic here as well, and that comes with the obvious down-side, that when it doesn't work out for someone on a motorcycle they get badly injured, or worse.
what's best about both places: the earlier post covered this for Honolulu: natural settings, the beach, the weather, great parks, people are generally nice, and the transportation system is good. The look and feel of Honolulu is great, and the rest of Oahu is even better.
Bangkok has a lot of diversity. Food themes are amazing, and there's a bit of everything to experience here. Traffic is terrible, and at time pollution is bad; there are down-sides. There isn't that much crime in either place, but it's something you need to keep in mind as a factor in Honolulu, but not so much here.
I really like the feel of Bangkok. There are countless places to go to shop, go to markets, to see events, or check out a temple, so that you can easily build up to having 100 favorite places to visit in the city. There are way more malls than the city needs, so many grocery stores, and lots of local markets. It's all almost a bit much. But that makes it feel vibrant and alive, that there is so much going on, block after block, for thousands of blocks.
comparing Chinatowns: maybe the two different Chinatowns work as an example of how the cities differ. Honolulu's has some interesting shops and restaurants, and the look and feel is novel. Lots of things are priced better than elsewhere, even though things still are kind of expensive there. Homelessness offsets the safety and positive feel there; it's better to not be around after dark. But it's still safe, and nice enough, and easy to get to from downtown or elsewhere; it's a moderate sized city. It looks clean and tropical.
Bangkok's Chinatown is massive. I've heard that it's the largest outside of China, maybe only rivaled by San Francisco's, but surely it's much bigger. The main street is packed and chaotic, with so many crowded side streets with lots of shops and street-themed food areas. It doubles as a wholesale vending area, many parts of it. People live there too, and there are bars and cafes; themes mix, with no limitations imposed by zoning. Tea shops are decent, but lots of that theme doesn't carry over directly from the influence of Chinese culture, so they're generally not great. There's not much Thai tea there, reminding me of looking for Japanese tea in a Chinatown there, before figuring out that it's the one place that you go to emphasize Chinese culture instead.
Like that Chinatown Bangkok is a beautiful mess. For people not on that page it would be too much, and it could seem awful. It's not orderly and Westernized; there are few places where you can sit down with a standard Western menu to eat. There are some, of course. I don't mean to buy spaghetti carbonara or a hamburger; I mean that in general you have to just know what they sell, or ask them, which only works well if you can speak Thai.
jostling through crowds and buying snacks |
In the Honolulu Chinatown there might be a dozen odd shops carrying unusual goods to check out, or a second dozen that are harder to find. In Bangkok's version it's essentially endless. You could see all of that Chinatown in a few months, if you put the right amount of time and effort in. I've visited dozens of times and don't really keep exploring, as much as visiting the same half dozen places that I like to go best.
Bangkok in general is like that; people end up appreciating and experiencing their own version of it. Then you explore from there, whether you want to or not, as other themes and places come up.
![]() |
oddly there are no old tea shops like this in Honolulu (but plenty in Bangkok) |
Street fairs or festivals make for a good example of this. I've visited maybe two dozen versions of these over the years, not much over one per year. That's not counting Loy Krathong, or other holiday themed events; to me visiting somewhere to celebrate that is just a normal annual experience. I've seen countless others in passing, that we didn't have time to check out just then. You step into a different world every time you visit one. It's not necessarily better than visiting a local fair in the US; those are great there too.
The kids and I just visited a street fair in Waikiki, and have seen parades there, but essentially it's the same thing over and over (the Waikiki versions). That's down to most of the vendors being the same, the food and trinket vending booths. Where in Bangkok you can buy snacks or substantial foods for $1 or so, of many types, there everything costs $10 to 20, so that you could easily eat a dinner of those snacks or grilled meat items for $50. It's a bit absurd, paying amusement park pricing at a street fair ($10 hot dogs and such). But that's Waikiki for you.
oddly this was the last Bangkok street fair I've been to |
an arts themed festival in an old part of town |
not a street festival; this part of town is patterned after trendy areas in Seoul |
this is Seoul; places look a little like this in Bangkok, but it's hard to copy it all directly |
Loy Krathong; most of that is biodegradable (flowers and bread), and they clean it out later |
a bittersweet memory; you can never go back |