Tay Con Linh (Ha Giang) 2015 Vietnamese sheng from a Hanoi shop

Based on a suggestion from a friend I bought tea by mail order from a small local shop in Hanoi a couple months ago.  Typically I don't do that, but there are surely a lot of small, local vendors, most without physical stores, that would be much better options for tea sourcing than any that are more standard, both in terms of value and in offering unique tea versions.  Running a physical shop adds a lot of overhead cost (just less in Hanoi than in some other places), so physical shop source value tends to not match purely online sources, but in this case I really wanted to try the teas.

That friend--online only at the time, but I've met her since--is Pop or Danittha.  Thais always have nicknames, mentioned in this post about a local tasting outing.

Pop (Danittha) is beside me, second from right

Here's a Facebook contact for that shop, HIỀN MINH TEA, and their web page for this sheng version (http://hienminhtea.com/green-puerh-2015-pho-nhi-song-2015/) which seems to be down right now; too bad.  I do have a copy of a product description that Pop passed on.

Vietnamese shu can be hit and miss, and I'd take tree age claims with a grain of salt, but tasting tells a lot of the story

That pricing mentioned in that listing photo doesn't work out to much; I'm not confirming that's actually what I paid, and it's too much trouble to look it up again in an email trail or Paypal reference.  It seems like the tea probably has aged and changed since that was written, since it's very smooth and not all bitter now.  If that is the current price still it sells for $13 per 100 grams, or equivalent to a $47 357 gram cake.  No wonder I wanted to buy it.  It's funny how local pricing varies related to Western-facing online equivalents; I won't even mention what friends who travel in the North of Vietnam say you can buy local sheng for there, but it's definitely not priced at well over $100 per kg, no matter what it is.  I should get out more.

South East Asian sheng versions tend to span an interesting range, sometimes quite similar to Yunnan versions and sometimes not so much; the appeal was really more about that than likely value.

Unless I'm mistaken Ha Giang is a province, and the Tay Con Linh reference could be something else, which Wikipedia fills in:


Hà Giang has many mountains, including the two highest peaks, namely, the Tây Côn Lĩnh (2,419 metres (7,936 ft)) and the Kiều Liêu Ti (2,402 metres (7,881 ft)) and forests that provide lumber. It has about 1,000 species of herbal plants. Fauna include tigers, peafowl, pheasants, and pangolin.[3] The town of Hà Giang was heavily damaged during the 1979 war with China[clarification needed][citation needed] but has since been rebuilt.[3]


I could write a post about the tangents that brings up.  One might expect this to be on the border with China, related to that conflict reference and to them producing sheng there, and it is, per the Wikipedia reference map also included here.


This review occurs in two parts, as initial notes and a comparison with another tea (with that approach explained in the second section following).

Initial review

Initially the tea is nice, a bit light yet but soft, rich, and sweet, perhaps with a faint hint of smoke. The other range and flavor is promising.

It's hard to describe. It's vaguely floral, with a light earthy edge, and it doesn't seem woody but it has some vegetal range. It's a little towards spice range but not quite there either.  Maybe in the middle, with an aromatic edge similar to cedar, so woody, but not in the most normal senses. More of the same next rounds, so I'll skip ahead to the next for notes.

Warmth and mineral picks up. Sweetness is still nice, and other flavor complexity, and a mild bitterness balances those well.

I tasted this with Sasha and Danittha not long ago (in that outing mentioned), and they seemed to not love it. Preferences vary; it all works well for me.  I ran through some questions about if it really seems 4 years old, in discussion with others and with the vendor, but to some extent it doesn't matter.  It seemed the leaves might darken more with that much aging, but the character aspect relates to where it started, and expected changes relate to storage conditions, so it's hard to tell.

It's softer and less bitter than standard Yunnan sheng (although maybe not atypical for 4 year old versions); it seems like local style SE Asian versions often do. A Laos version I just reviewed seemed to have a touch more of a catchy taste, a butteriness in both smooth feel and flavor range joining more standard floral flavor. This is nice though.

I expected the brewed leaves to be darker

Second tasting

Those notes seemed really vague to me.  Sometimes I'm a bit hazy in the mornings and what registers could be limited by that.  It seems possible some teas could be less distinct in terms of attributes, flattened out a little for individual aspect intensity, even if general character is still really positive.  Aging could do that at different points in time too, flatten out intensity, and round off more pronounced flavors, lending a balanced character but diminishing specific aspects.

I'm re-tasting this tea along with the 2019 Hekai version that I just reviewed.  They seemed vaguely similar in profile, and the age difference should stand out quite a bit, perhaps even if the Vietnamese tea is really only a year or two old versus four (which I'm not claiming is likely, just saying).  Either way I'll get a clear second impression, and this will provide a way to gauge quality level, to see if there aren't gaps or limitations for either across some aspect range.

On that subject, I didn't get around to speculating what the outcome would be related to drinking a sheng version too young in that Hekai and Guangbie 2019 sheng review, before it had time to properly settle.  I've heard some discussion of that, that it's typical to let the teas rest for a period of time, not so much related to tasting for evaluation, which vendors would have to do, but for consumers to experience them in a more fully developed form.  Who knows though; maybe that varies by tea, or maybe per personal preference.  Since I'd be passing on ideas from discussions more than from personal experience it seems as well to not be more specific, to say how I expect this Hekai version might change over the next two months or so.  I'll try it again then and see.

Review

Hein Minh tea left, from a later round

The Vietnamese version (Ha Giang; I guess I could've been calling this, by a region name at least, or more conventionally as a Tay Con Linh, by specific area) is pleasant; I can see why I liked it.  It's warm in tone, nicely balanced, and subtle, but with reasonable aspect intensity, smooth but full in feel, and so on.  The flavor is hard to pin down.  It's vaguely floral, but on the warmer end of that range, with warm mineral supporting that.  There's a catchy flavor aspect that's faint as of yet, a trace of fruitiness; I'll get back to saying more about that, unless it drops out.

The Hekai has a bit of an edge to it in comparison, a bright freshness with some astringency, almost like a green tea.  It's complex too, showing good intensity, just a bit light for this being the initial infusion.  I'm expecting these to evolve towards each other based on the last impressions of both, or else this won't be a comparison of teas close in style.  At this stage floral tone stands out the most.


On the next round the Ha Giang version is similar, with the cedar wood tone picking up a little.  That really works well for being integrated with a good bit of floral range and sweetness, and with subtle mineral acting as a linked base.

Someone once asked me about always noticing mineral in sheng, and my response really comes in two parts.  One is that if you expect some aspect or general range to be present it's a lot easier to pick it up.  I suppose even if it's really not there, interpreting something else to be that, to extend that just a little.  If I had read "cocoa" in a review description for this tea it might well taste like cocoa to me (and now that I think of it that kind of works).  I expect mineral to be pronounced in sheng, so it seems to be.  Another blogger once mentioned getting stuck on experiencing cherry in black teas, so that almost every one tasted a little like that, requiring going back and deciding when to pull that back out of review notes in a final version for relating to an expectation bias as much as a pronounced aspect.

The other part is that I'm talking about a type of flavor range that sets context for the rest, not something that necessarily stands out, but as part of the general range of all that's experienced.  It would be like picking up a stock base in a food dish as a component used to add an underlying complexity to it, or even like noticing that salt was added, when those are there but don't stand out.  It plays a role but the designed effect is to serve as a background (in food at least, since it's not "designed" in tea), but in the case of tea mineral can work out similarly.


It's odd how that astringency edge stands out more in the Hekai than I noticed the first time.  In part that could be because the other tea completely lacks it, so it stands out in comparison.  It's like biting a tree branch tip, that type of feel combined with a certain expression of bitterness.  It's mild but clearly there, and novel.  This may or may not relate to a typical experience when tasting a brand-new sheng version.  I can sort of see why I thought the two overlapped in character but it's not coming across in direct comparison, at least in the first two rounds.  This is more bitter, but also bitter in a completely different way.  I still wouldn't see this as a relatively bitter version of sheng; that part is still moderate.

Hien Minh left; it is darker 

other 2015 and 2018 sheng versions, reviewed here

The pictures above provide some reference for evaluating leaf color transition.  Photo brightness can relate to lighting conditions and a camera setting; that has to factored back out, to the extent that editing doesn't adjust for it.


On the third infusion the Ha Giang version really levels off to a very nice balance.  It's subtle, but there are interesting layers to the experience, and the aspects integrate well together.  I can see why I just didn't have luck putting a description into words; "floral, cedar, warm mineral" kind of catches it, in a sense, but at the same time completely misses it.  That warmth does extend a bit towards coming across as cocoa, and the sweetness does extend towards coming across as dried fruit.  It's the overall effect and balance that really works, but discussing mouth-feel and aftertaste is going to run into a parallel limitation.  It's quite pleasant but hard to describe why, in what ways.

That specific astringency is only now leveling off a bit in the Hekai version; it may well soften further and allow other deeper-level aspects to show through, as these naturally transition to be stronger.  There's one specific floral tone that's unusually strong and pronounced.  That effect comes across as similar to dandelion, the way a pronounced and distinct bitterness stands out, with a related specific floral range along with that (not that you typically eat dandelion flowers, or that I'm going to claim I kept tasting them as a child).  I guess it's a bit towards orchid but I don't think it's exactly that either, maybe not so far from daisy, very light and bright.  Oddly warmer aspect range joins that, but with bright floral and bitterness standing out that gives it a split in character range, or at least covering a broad scope, however one interprets that.


All this reminds me of why tasting a tea a single time for review is really just passing on a limited first impression.  Ideally a reviewer would taste teas at least three times, but combining sets of notes is a considerable task.  And tasting while making relatively complete notes can take 2 hours, with any degree of other messing around, and I typically only have time for that on two weekend days.  It throws off the experience too, making detailed notes, even though it could be seen as a positive trade-off that it forces you to make impressions clearer, and narrow them to verbal descriptions.  I wouldn't want to do it every day no matter how much free time I had; writing two reviews per weekend wipes out any day of the week to just relax while drinking tea instead.  I try not to drink too much tea as well, only once or twice a day.


I'll leave off this round since this isn't supposed to be a round-by-round comparison anyway.  The Ha Giang (Tay Con Linh) tea hasn't transitioned, but it's still quite positive as it was, well balanced and complex.  It never did work to draw out more specifics for flavor aspects; never mind.

The Hekai is at it's best so far.  This tea probably will level off to a different character within a few months of settling, and the Guangbie version that I comparison tasted it along with just happened to come across as more complex and positive earlier on.  I can see why some of the warmer tones seemed shared between these two versions, or even integrating floral range in a vaguely comparable but different way, but the differences stand out a lot more than similarities in direct comparison tasting.  The brightness and intensity in this tea is different, and the expression of astringency, and form of floral tone, overall character, etc. 

I think the age difference ties in a lot with all that, that these may share range that would come across a lot more if that wasn't a main input.  It's probably closer to true that my impression of similarity was just wrong than that they're quite similar beyond that, and I accurately identified that commonality by interpreting past the age (fermentation transition) differences.