I'm reviewing another tea from Chang Kham, sent by that business owner for review (many thanks). He is the family member of the Sen Xing Fa Bangkok Chinatown shop that I have met a number of times over the years, who now runs a shop and outlet by that name up in Chiang Mai (located here).
I just noticed in editing this it was from 2025, so a year old now. A tea like this probably improves slightly over the first half a year or so, as it settles, and is all the better now. It probably won't change that much with aging over the next year or two, maybe just fading slightly, but not even all that much of that, if well stored.
All that is guesswork; I don't mean to imply the level of confidence in that conclusion that it implies. The main point is that there's not much concern that it wouldn't be as good related to being a year old. Maybe it's not really better, but it wouldn't just lose intensity or freshness, like a green tea.
A description from their website:
That tea costs 1500 baht for 100 grams ($45), listed on their website. Is that a good value?
Not really, by Thai local standards, but then there isn't that much tea of this quality level around. It would be hard to place this against any other Thai version to use as a market price, so I'm really comparing against teas from China. I can check on one though, since Tea Side is a Western facing outlet that carries exceptions related to what is produced:
2025 Old Trees Organic Black Tea N3, Loose Leaf ($19 for 100 grams)
Loose black tea from 100-300-year-old trees, the highest quality material.
This is a classic black tea from trees. It is well-fermented and possesses an invigorating strong taste with many semitones and a rich aroma. The taste profile: tea rose, tulips, dried fruits, a little caramel.
Suitable for both, utilitarian consumption with sweets and for the thoughtful tea ceremony.
The teas are probably fairly similar, but I might like the Tea Side version a little more, since their teas tend to match a Dian Hong style (from what I've tried in the past; it's a guess, related to this tea), and this was one flavor aspect removed from that standard profile (so still pretty close).
So $45 is a bit much. You always pay more for teas sold in brick and mortar shops, than in purely online outlets, as a rule, which is somewhat fair. Their overhead is a lot higher, and they offer you the benefit of trying teas before you buy them (usually; that varies by store). Also $19 is a pretty good price for what I expect that other Thai tea to be; 20-some would still be ok.
It seems strange blaming a vendor for value when they send a tea for review (many thanks for that!), but I don't intend this that way. These kinds of really rare teas vendors would source at different pricing, and their marketing and final pricing is up to them.
It's quite possible that you couldn't find a close equivalent to either of these teas anywhere else. The supply chains aren't anything like standard farm production, so I'm not clear on what factors go into costs. And it's possible that the Chang Kham tea is much better than the Tea Side version; only someone who has tried both would know.
Review:
first infusion: this is good. The style is distinctive, in a way that's familiar if you try enough versions of black tea; hopefully that comes across in description. It tastes malty, but not quite as dry and mineral intensive as Assam versions (from that area in India). It's not exactly like a malted milk ball or milkshake malt, but sort of right in between the two.
Beyond that another flavor included is cacao. There's a bit of fruit as well, more or less along the line of dried dark cherry. It's a nice mix. Feel is rich, even though this is really just getting started. It even expresses some aftertaste effect, while still starting out. Through it all that one cacao note stands out, which is a pleasant aspect to bring the rest into a nice balance.
Because this tea lacks a lot of astringency you could brew it as intense as you want, and it would be fine. The way these flavors are combining, with pleasant intensity, it would be as well to keep infusion strength on the light-medium side, because it will all probably come across well that way.
second infusion: similar to the first round, but a little stronger. There is a slight sour note to this, a bit like aged cardboard, that some people could find off-putting, and then for others it would just link to a separate mineral range that works well. Early in my tea exploration I kept trying versions that went by the name / type Golden Monkey, and they were a bit like that. Let's check what that might be, from Wikipedia:
Golden Monkey tea (Chinese: 金猴茶; pinyin: jīn hóu chá) is a black tea originating from the Fujian and Yunnan provinces in China. Only the bud and first leaf are picked, and the tea leaves are characterized by the pale gold threading. Golden Monkey tea is a black tea counterpart of Silver Needle white tea. The flavor profile of golden monkey tea is characterized by light, honeyed peach notes, and its lack of astringency. The name "Golden Monkey" can be used for many black teas.
...Despite the fact that tea has been grown in Yunnan for 1700 years, Golden Monkey is a relatively new tea, about 300 years old.[5] It has only been produced for export in the last 13–18 years.
This is a review of a local Thai version from 2014, almost dating back to that range. I would describe teas differently now, but it sounds at least comparable.
That post describes a taste as resembling cantaloupe, and that might apply to this. Or one part is definitely like sun-dried tomato, that sweet and savory flavor. Cacao is still present, but not as the dominant flavor. Warm mineral picks up, perhaps related to this being brewed a little stronger, or it just evolving across rounds. All in all it's pretty good. Again flavor preference in relation to that one flavor aspect is what would determine a take on this tea, if it seems off, or if that's regarded as pleasant, the one balsa wood sort of flavor. I like it.
third infusion: not really changing much. It might pick up a little depth, and coat my mouth a little differently, feeling a little different.
It's interesting to compare and contrast this with typical Dian Hong range, an overall personal favorite. That malt note wouldn't be similar; Yunnan versions aren't generally like that. I guess if they are a Golden Monkey type maybe it could be more common? I wouldn't know. Some cacao and range not completely unlike roasted yam is common. I've not been describing this as like roasted yam, but it's similar, and that's one possible interpretation. It probably works better for this third round than it had before, so it is probably changing a little. The way the set of aspects comes across is similar though, even though it all may be shifting slightly.
The feel is nice, but it's hard to describe how or why. It's rich, and a bit heavy, but quite smooth. Maybe one might say that it's velvety. As quality level goes this tea is fine; it's good. It's more a matter of how it matches or misses related to personal preference for flavors.
I'll brew one more round a bit stronger, and this tea won't be finished, but that should be enough description. Sometimes late rounds can be just as positive as earlier ones, or teas can thin in ways that aren't as positive, but to me that's usually not a main story of how the tea is. It's interesting trying tea that is this approachable, in the mild and flavorful black tea range, but then I just did review a couple in relation to buying one from Viet Sun, and them sending a sample. They weren't completely different than this.
fourth infusion: that malt note is the strongest it has been, probably in part related to brewing this a little longer, and related to it evolving that way. For people who have tried a few similar versions of Golden Monkey all of this should be ringing a bell. As I remember those may not have matched this for some of the minor aspect range that shows a tea's quality, for flavor intensity and complexity, overall positive character, rich feel, and aftertaste trailing over, adding depth to the experience.
That one balsa wood sort of note was at the center of those experiences too, if I remember right. I wonder what that's from, if a processing form input causes that, or it's somehow related to using common tea material to start.
Conclusions:
When these kinds of black teas really work for you it's pleasant to drink a kilogram or two of them, to make it a part of a routine rotation. I wouldn't mind having about 250 grams of this, but I wouldn't want to drink it every week for the next year. That one malt and balsa wood note isn't something I'd want to repeat experiencing 100 times (although 30 or 40 might be ok).
But then it's funny how all of that is completely subjective taste dependent. I'm touchy about a black tea being tart, at all, but if a version has depth I don't mind if flavor intensity is on the low side. Cacao, roasted sweet potato, and roasted yam are personal favorites for flavor inclusions (so this does cover quite a bit of that too), referring back to the earlier comment about liking the main Dian Hong style best.
It's a good tea version. It's definitely worth trying this style, to see what you make of it. I think almost anyone would like this tea, so I'm really focusing on how for some people it might be a personal favorite and for others it wouldn't.
On a completely different subject, Keoni and I checked out a really local shopping center in the Victory Monument area this past week to get a pizza (strange it related to that food choice). I love those older places; it feels like we're out of town.


































