Showing posts with label Xigui. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Xigui. Show all posts

Sunday, November 17, 2024

Jip Eu Lao Banzhang and Xigui sheng compared with Moychay LBZ


Jip Eu Xigui left, then JE LBZ middle, and Moychay version right, in all photos


I visited my favorite local Bangkok Chinatown shop over a month ago now, before visiting the US, to pick up some basic Shui Xian for gifts "back home."  The owner, Kittichai, gave me some coins of what look to be interesting sheng pu'er.  His description of what they are:


This tea is the product that the shop sells. It is raw Pu-erh tea. There are 4 production sources: 1. Laobanzhang, 2. Xigui, 3. Pingdao, 4. Yiwu (ripe Pu-erh). It is produced by Si Da Ming Pu Company, which is a factory owned by relatives.




They were #1 and 2 of those, the LBZ and Xigui.  

Given how LBZ works out the next question that arises is always "is it real?"  There is a narrower village area, what LBZ is really supposed to mean, and then the common claim is that much of what is presented as such is really from a larger area, so related but not exactly the same.  I'm not accusing that shop or this tea of it not being legitimate; I can't really weigh in on source location issues like that.  Which brings up how one might even begin to guess about that origin issue, or weigh any evidence.


it would've been cool if the tiny discs had age stamps on the labels


I've tried a number of LBZ versions, or teas presented as such, maybe a half dozen or so, or at least 4 or 5; it's hard to keep track.  I just noticed that I had some from Moychay LBZ from a few years back, a 2020 version, so I can compare the versions.  Of course one version being aged longer changes everything, and it's not as if teas from those narrow source areas are necessarily all completely identical.  Every year micro-climate issues change the harvest, and very local growing conditions factor in, along with processing, and there should be some variation in plant ages and type.

Trying three teas together would be a lot, but I do like to lean into combined tastings to keep these multi-part reviews moving along.  I'll do it!

I'll be skipping the part about referencing vendor product listings, because I don't have access to any.  The Jip Eu tea is sold by a Bangkok shop, and I didn't do an extensive search to see if I could find this online, but that's unlikely anyway.  I looked up the old review I wrote for this Moychay LBZ version (here), but it didn't reference a product link.  The post said that one was up but it didn't have pricing details yet; I really should've referenced it anyway, back then, in case it might still work now.  That review mentioned a lot of fruit, and of course it's on to warmer tones now, almost four years later.  The time just flies.

I never did get a production age from Jip Eu until after I tried these.  They're from 2018, so two years older than the Moychay version (2020), aged 6 years now, or maybe 6 1/2, depending on when they were made.  It was interesting considering that during the tasting, because it's not at all clear from the character.  They seem significantly aged, but not fully aged, and there is a lot of space for potential age in between a couple years old and a decade.




Review:




Jip Eu Xigui:  a little light; I didn't really try to stretch out a first infusion time enough to make this more conventional.  It works well getting a limited first impression then really starting on round 2.  

This will be good.  Complex floral tones already show through, supported by warmer range.  This almost has to be a good bit older than half a year old, this year's tea, judging from that character.  And from the brewed liquid color; both are too dark.  At an early guess this is probably better than the average sheng I try, maybe even some versions presented as exceptional.  There's a faint hint of smoke.  I'll do more of a list description next round.


Jip Eu Lao Banzhang:  in a sense forward flavors are less pronounced, but a richness and depth comes through better than for the first version already.  Again this just can't be a 2024 tea, or a whole section would be needed to discuss how that kind of anomaly could even occur, but I can't guess how old it is yet.  This is also clearly very exceptional tea, even based on getting a limited early impression.  Floral range is pleasant, and there's lots more going on with it.  Warm mineral depth is nice, positively supporting the rest, and feel is already positive.


Moychay Lao Banzhang:  this is going to hold its own with the other two, at the least; it is also exceptional.  It might be getting a slightly faster start for being maocha initially, for opening up and brewing faster, related to never having been compressed.  For this being a 2020 tea it has transitioned a good bit; early fresh, bright flavors have evolved to become pleasantly complex warmer tones, with an awful lot going on.  It has a pleasant fruitiness, which I'll describe more as I go.

For sure it's not possible to buy this tea, and hasn't been for years.  It's a shame; I can see why adding significant spending to tea sourcing to set away versions like this for mixed lengths of time would add a lot to tea experience.  If this had been a relatively costly (but perhaps still reasonable) $3 / gram setting aside an extra 50 grams would cost more than a standard boutique produced cake, as long as it wasn't gushu.  Along the way the same sourcing issue would come up; is it real?  It's quite good, but I never could definitively guess about origin location claims, even for more mundane source concerns.




JE Xigui #2:  these should be brewing just fine, on to guessing about infusion time for less material than I usually brew, maybe about 5 grams.  I'll err on the long side this round, just in case, and go close to 30 seconds.

There's a bit of smoke in this, pronounced enough that you can't miss it, but not overpowering.  There was a hint in the aroma the first round but you couldn't taste it as clearly; here you can.  It's strong enough that it's a main flavor input, so that does change things, so that someone's feeling about that input would determine the entire experience.  I don't mind it, but it's hard to see it as positive, an improvement.  Beyond that the rest is fine, some mixed floral range, good supporting mineral, and other harder to isolate warmer tones.  It may need to drop out over more rounds to enable a clearer interpretation of the rest.  

The smokiness tastes like wood fire smoke, like a fireplace that's empty but that has been used a lot.


Jip Eu LBZ:  as I interpret this it's in a place where initial brighter floral range is well along in transitioning to warmer tones, to spice range and such, with warm mineral replacing what was probably earlier on lighter mineral.  I don't think it's at the teenage-years threshold character where versions tend to not make sense, not fully switched over, but kind of showing gaps where the change hasn't filled in yet.  But it's not like a young / new sheng either; early sweet, light, bright range is well along with transitioning.  

Storage conditions varying so much related to changes makes it hard to guess the age.  7 or 8 years of dry storage can be comparable to just 3 or 4 in a warm, humid place, even if the changes aren't exactly the same.  It's not as if it's the same changes at a certain distance down a linear path.

Feel is quite pleasant, the way that full, warm mineral tones join a full, rich feel that seems related.  Bitterness is still present, but not much of it.  What is still there transitions nicely to sweetness after you drink it (funny how I never mention hui gan here; it's that).


Moychay LBZ:  that's so nice!  There's so much fruit present, in a very interesting and positive range.  A little dryness and bitterness offsets it, and there is plenty of warm mineral tone too, but one part of the flavor range is really interesting, complex, warm dried fruit.  This may not be a fair trial for the Jip Eu versions, if this has aged longer, and the extra couple of years has allowed it to evolve this depth and complexity.  Or it could be that varying storage inputs make that an uneven input, or that changes in initial form and potential mean the teas never would seem similar, even with the same storage input and amount of storage time to change them.

The warm dried fruit might be along the line of dried longan, but a root spice tone stands out just as much, as you try to break it down, towards sassafras.  The warmth and character range is reminiscent of cinnamon, it's just not a close match for flavor for that.  The fruit tone, or tones, I think people would interpret in different ways.  Dried longan is just a place-holder to give a clearer impression; really it's complex.  




Jip Eu Xigui #3:  I'm really feeling these teas already; that's the obvious drawback of trying a three way comparison.  I've already drank some water and ate a few nuts between these rounds; kind of early for resorting to that.

The smoke flavor might be settling out already in this, but it's still there.  It will probably take one more round to describe the rest better, which would work better if the smoke input happens to clear up.  I went with a fast infusion this round, no longer than 10 seconds, and that doesn't help the rest stand out more.


Jip Eu LBZ:  this is really good, quite exceptional.  It doesn't help it that the next version I'm comparing it to will be that much more complex and intense, across really interesting scope.  The two do overlap a little in basic flavor; dried fruit, with some floral range that's more in the background in the other that stands out in this.  The warmer tone range is comparable, mixing with other spice range.  

It may be that this isn't as transitioned as the other, so it's in a different place, back on floral versus fruit, not settled into warmer tone range yet.  It's good, and it's complex, but compared to the other it might seem a little muted.  It can't really be the "in-between" timing and fermentation transition concern; no matter how young or old these are this seems slightly less fermentation-transitioned than the other four year old version.  

Fall material versions can come across as less intense; an input like that might come into play.  That's also one way that LBZ material can turn up in remotely accessible or affordable forms, along with origin being just a little outside that narrower village area range, or from somewhere else entirely.


Moychay LBZ:  warmth and depth picks up in this; it's different trying it brewed this fast.  This may "brew out" relatively quickly, given how fast it got started, and that I'm not using that much leaf for this, maybe about 5 grams, or it could even be 4.

This is much more whole-leaf compared to the other two versions.  That should reduce astringency in this version, and increase it in the others (relatively), muting intensity a little in this, and adding more challenging aspect range to the others.  They're all pretty approachable though; that makes me think the other two must not be very young material, along with the flavor tones being warm, brewed leaf darkening some, and liquid color not being lighter.  

This Moychay version is quite dark in brewed liquid appearance, on the red side.  That's actually a little unfamiliar, a sheng of this age turning that red.  It's been here in Bangkok for some years (3?), and that pushes the pace of transition.  Still the brewed liquid color is reddish, not so far off how black teas appear, not just darkened, more gold or onto between golden and amber instead.

A bit more warm mineral tone and astringency edge seems to emerge, possibly a function of the infusion transition cycle, and also related to brewing this round faster.  It would seem odd if that was it's best flavor range already passed through, while the Xigui version is still dropping out an early smoke aspect.  I'll give all three between 15 and 20 seconds next round, to get back to a more conventional infusion strength (for me, I guess that I mean).


Xigui #4:  there is some darkened area on the wet leaves; that smoke seems to relate to char from the leaf actually being singed a little.  It may not drop out then, if it's not from smoke contact, instead from the leaf being slightly burned.

It's not dropping out.  There's good sweetness and pleasant aspect range beyond it, it's just harder for me to identify in that context.  This tea does seem to be good for quality level; feel is full and rich, and overall character is refined.  I suppose it would be complex floral tones that I'd be going on more about.  Complexity is probably pretty good too; there are layers of different aspects present.  If someone is fine with a touch of smoke, or even enjoys that, this could still seem exceptional.  

I can appreciate it as pleasant to drink but it's throwing off evaluating it related to it being a better than average quality sheng version, or related to describing other aspects in detail.


JE LBZ:  this is getting even better.  Richness is more intense; overall complexity and balance is better.  Intensity isn't necessarily a strength, but there's a lot going on, across a very positive range.  

Dried fruit mixes with other layers of aspects, or other range, making it harder to isolate.  That's along the line of dried mango, combining with limited warm floral range, warm mineral, and some spice tones.  Some bitterness and a rich feel, including a little dryness, adds to the overall complexity.  The final effect is pleasant, refined, and complex, just not necessarily as intense as it might be.


Moychay LBZ:  this is evolving, changing.  Dried fruit range is similar but different; spice range is just as pronounced, or even more so, but again it's changing.  Dried fruit had reminded me of dried longan, and a touch more savory edge is showing up in this, maybe shifting towards dried tamarind.  Spice range is different, in a way that's hard to describe.  

There's still a catchy set of complex, approachable flavors present, related to the earlier set.  Maybe a touch of warm menthol joins the rest, like a less edgy version of mint, or menthol.  Or camphor, plenty of people might move directly on to suggesting, given how standard interpretations go, but to me it's more like an extra hint of wintergreen mint.  

This definitely isn't fading yet; interesting transitions are still occurring.  Five rounds is so much tea though, 15 of these little cups; that might have to do.  I'll need another break just to get to that next round.




Xigui #5:  smoke input is lightening, balancing out a bit.  This is pretty good tea, evident in the layers of inputs, the complex flavors and rich feel.  It's funny how that one smoke input can really alter and redefine the rest.  As it is this is a good example of a pretty good tea, but a lot of distinctiveness drops out for natural focus shifting to that one aspect.


JE LBZ:  also a very pleasant, rich, complex, and refined tea.  It giving up range in terms of intensity and novel flavor inputs stands out a lot more in comparison with the other LBZ version; it would seem better without that comparison.  It'll be interesting to hear the age of this tea, to see how that input led to this result.


Moychay LBZ:  a little brighter, more complex and novel in flavor range, also warmer in a sense, with warm mineral tones and rich feel supporting the rest, and just as refined as the other.  It's hard to not conclude that it's better.  It may be fading just a little already, having spent a lot of early intensity relatively quickly.  

Something unusual seemed to have been happening with how this age-transitioned; it seems as much like it's slightly oxidized as it seems fermented.  The color is a part of that, it being reddish, but a warm tone range reminds me of black tea character.  Quite often that comes up in lower quality sheng that's not made properly, which doesn't have good aging potential, and ends up tasting woody before it's even fully aged.  This isn't like that.  It's exceptional, and aging to be just as pleasant as when young, just in a different novel character.

Maybe the hot and humid Bangkok conditions pushed it through a much faster transition cycle than 4 1/2 years would usually enable?  Maybe it being maocha enabled that to go even faster, so that this is as transitioned as 7 or 8 year old versions stored under different conditions would experience?  It's possible that tea stored in cool and dry conditions, tightly pressed, would change less in a decade, and that the form those changes would take would vary.  It's quite good as it is though, the main thing.  

It seems at least possible that this lost some 15 to 20 year cycle transition potential along the way, that it's not in the right place to keep improving for more than another decade as a result.  Only time would really tell.  It seems likely that the other LBZ version would fade over the next 3 or 4 years, in addition to changing to include more warm flavor tones.


Conclusions:


The missing input in those notes had been the age of the two two Jip Eu versions (produced by the Si Da Ming Pu Company; mentioned earlier in the description, but not something I've been repeating).  It's from 2018; it was two years older than the LBZ version used for comparison, 6 years old now.

It makes sense that it's a bit less intense, related to having more time to age-transition, but that wasn't necessarily completely evident in the other character.  Level of transition seems pretty comparable, in relation to markers like color of leaves, color of brewed liquid, and range of flavor tones, or maybe slightly less transitioned.  That's not so unusual; the tea was compressed instead, and probably spent a good bit of time in Yunnan, maybe essentially the whole time.  Bangkok climate changes tea fast.  

I've been running in 90+F / 30+C high humidity (70% or so) conditions lately (in Bangkok), and it only cools down to 90 F / 30 C in the evening.  It's not the rainy season but it rains sometimes, and it's crazy how humid it is at other times anyway.  It's hot and humid for tea and for people.

It's hard to place why the Jip Eu LBZ would be that much less intense, but it had good complexity and good positive character, so that only stood out as much in the direct comparison.  Maybe it was autumn harvest material; that would make a difference.  One thing I didn't emphasize much in the review description was that the broken leaf character of the two Jip Eu versions should have caused much higher astringency experience; that should've changed the feel, related to the other.  Maybe the extra aging time offset that, without causing other changes that made it seem significantly older (but then 2 more years isn't that much older).

I can't say anything about value related to these, since I don't know any pricing ranges, but I could guess a little about quality level.  For the Xigui that's problematic because to me a bit of smokey character defined that tea experience, and to me that's not really a conventional input for better teas, as it had been more normal quite awhile back, related to how sheng often was a decade ago.  

That leaves considering which of the LBZ versions seemed better.  I suppose the Moychay version did.  It was more whole leaf (not necessarily better taken alone, but that can tie to more positive aspects), and a bit more complex and intense, and both had comparable positive character.  It was favorable that the Moychay LBZ expressed a bit more dried fruit, more supporting spice range, and then either a little mint or camphor.

The Jip Eu LBZ was well worth experiencing though.  If it was selling for a moderate price, maybe even beyond $1 a gram, given how "moderate" can be relative, then it seems worth trying out.  

Things shift for me related to trying a pleasant 10 gram--or so; about that--coin of exceptional tea versus buying a 200 gram small cake of one.  $10 is good bit to spend on two tea sessions, but not much for trying exceptional tea (not that I know the pricing for these; I don't).  There's just absolutely no way I'd spend $200 on a 200 gram cake, of just about anything.  If I earned three times as much income and my son's upcoming college education expenses seemed more sorted out maybe, but as things stand spending $90 on a standard size cake is already plenty.

It was really nice trying these.  It leads me to think about how these are in comparison with the last two sets of pretty good sheng I've been trying, the last two reviews, but it's too much to go into.  Sheng can vary a lot in character, and be quite positive in different ways, for different reasons.  That Tea Mania Mengsong from last week's review was pretty good (a 2014, with lots of variation in probably aging changes and related character), but this Moychay LBZ is in a really nice place now, and it's that much more novel, setting aside simple pleasantness of aspects.



where I run; the lights make it nice



the view at work, with a screen adding a digital effect


Sunday, November 11, 2018

More Liquid Proust set sheng (Jing Mai, Jinggu, and Xigui)






I'm trying three more sheng from a Liquid Proust introductory set.  I've pre-ordered more from his main group-buy offering already, the Sheng Olympiad.  If someone wants to participate in they probably should click on that link and hit order right away; the number of slots is limited.  As for more background I wrote an interview post about Andrew and that group buy theme awhile back here, and first and second review posts covering five separate sheng from this set at those links.  It's always nice getting to experience new range in  sheng and teas in general.

These tea types follow:

2016 Jingmai Love (which turns out to be from Crimson Lotus)

2018 Jinggu

2018 Xigui

There are no Liquid Proust web pages for these teas; at a glance he doesn't sell any of them.  It's not ideal tasting teas of different ages together--and a judgment call to do combined tasting of sheng at all--but the point is just to cover ground and compare tea styles, so lack of full parallel structure doesn't matter so much.

Jing Mai is a familiar region and the other two sort of ring a bell.  Pinning down area names related to where they are in relation to each other, and sorting out village names versus broader area designations, comes up when exploring sheng in more detail.  I won't get far with background on that but citing a standard research summary blog will frame the background a little.  The following citations and images are from Tea DB; maybe better known for video reviews, but at one point they did more with research and text.

This post's image covers some local Yunnan areas, with discussion of local character that gets around to filling in one of the three of these sources, about the Xigui village in Lincang prefecture:




...Single-origin Lincang cakes are generally thought of as being green and bitter in their youth. Critics of Lincang regard Lincang raw pu’erh as cold and harsh some arguing that it is also slower to age.

Xiaguan is also known for their house taste that deviates from the single-origin taste...

Bangdong:   A county and village in eastern Lincang north of the Mengku area. Most famously, Bangdong is home to Xigui village, one of the most-hyped & expensive areas for new school pu’erh....


So far so good.  I'm filling in this research after writing the review notes, and of course these teas may or may not match some standard typical character anyway.  Onto another Tea DB post that frames where the other two source areas are located, along with this image (noting that Pu'er / Simao is in the broader map image above showing multiple prefectures):




Jingmai is a mountain located in Lancang County in the southwest corner of Pu’er Prefecture. This area is one of the subregions that fetches higher prices on par with Xishuangbanna.  Similar to Yibang and Xikong, the small leaf varietal is common here...

...Jinggu is a county, village and area in central Pu’er Prefecture that neighbors Lincang and the Shuangjiang Mengku areas... Jinggu is one of the larger growing regions in Pu’er Prefecture and includes a few famous growing areas in Jinggu including Kuzhu, Puzhen, Lao Wushan, Yangta.


The rest of those two posts are worth a close read for anyone interested in placing local sheng production areas.  There is some mention of conventional aspects profiles but of course those vary by individual tea, and mean more once you experience them even when teas do seem characteristic of a general narrow area type.  Onto review then.


Review




The Jing Mai is earthy, a bit smoky, not overwhelmingly bitter but some bitterness stands out.  Being two years old would have tempered the initial intensity and bitterness, flattened the flavors a little.  Depending on the starting point that could have improved or else greatly diminished the appeal of the tea.

Two years old seems about the normal limit for drinking young sheng with a little age on it (although practices would vary, along with preferences and the way the changes play out with different initial character).  Different people cite a lot of different ranges as "awkward middle-years," and it seems like they're talking about preferring a narrow range of tea types that really would be nicer in other age ranges, but with different people saying different things, talking about different teas.

The Jinggu is a lot more bitter; no surprise there.  Someone would need to like bitterness as a main aspect in tea to like this.  I'm ok with it being a main aspect, just not with it being the main flavor that comes across.  Some of the rest is earthy in an unusual way.  I take this to be the taste of kerosene that people tend to complain about.  Alternatively it could be seen as mineral intensive, which sounds better.  To me it really seems like a mix of mineral (actual rocks, extending quite a bit into metal) combined with a vegetal aspect in the range of tree fungus, those half-circle partial disks, or smaller versions that grow as groups.  It's not bad, it just might be better once it loosens up a little.

Smoke stands out in the Xigui.  I reviewed a tea that I said was almost certainly smoked not long ago (Chen's Fire, also from this Liquid Proust set), and although this flavor isn't so far off that I think this could be naturally occurring instead.  Some sheng tastes like smoke.  I tend to not like it, the way smoke pairs with the rest, preferring how smoke compliments black tea character, but reaction to it would just be a matter of preference.

Under that the range isn't so different from the Jinggu but I'd describe it more as green wood over pronounced mineral versus those other aspects.  That's odd, saying it's similar, and then putting a completely different label on what it tastes like, but the general effect is similar even though the actual taste is shifted.  Both share a lot of mineral range.  Since these will keep evolving, especially early on, it seems as well to go with a quick initial take for now.

Second infusion



The Jing Mai improved a bit, gaining some complexity.  It'll probably shift quite a bit one more time to really open up.  A spice aspect kicked in.  It's hard to place, not so far from cinnamon but that's not it.  I guess saying it's between that and nutmeg kind of works.  The mineral evolved too, moving from more rock tone into rusted iron, which is actually nice, the way that stays with you as an aftertaste, something you both taste and feel running down your tongue.  It'll be interesting to see how the next round changes.

The Jinggu transitioned quite a bit too; it's cool experiencing teas like these, even when the flavors or other aspects aren't a perfect match for personal preference.  The bitterness eased up to give the other range some space and warm earthiness picked up.  It seems like a warm version of damp forest floor replaced what I was interpreting as tree fungus (over mineral).  Again I think the main transition balance will occur next round.  I would've expected this tea to be more challenging than it is; mouthfeel is substantial but not rough, and bitterness isn't in a bad balance even for being so early on, before it tends to ease up.  It's still a little like kerosene but that effect stands out a lot less.

The Xigui is still mostly showing off the smoke.  These all softened a little because I used a really short infusion, letting it run out towards 10 seconds the first round to get things started faster.  For younger sheng brewed at a high proportion very short infusion times are just a given.  At half the proportion letting it go for 10 seconds or even 15 would work.  Given I'm tasting three teas that probably would've made more sense; I for sure can't finish 30 small cups of these teas, and they won't be finished after 10 rounds.  Brewed twice as long they would have been.  For now I'll just describe this infusion as "smoke" for this tea and add to that next time.

Third infusion



not the same day; that's flavored "Thai" tea

Two infusions in I'm really feeling these teas.  I never did get my caffeine tolerance back to the earlier level after being sick the week before last and doing a detox (or break from caffeine, if you rather).  I've been drinking a tisane in the afternoons half the time, not even doing two regular sessions of tea a day for half the week.  It's only caffeine (mostly); I'll be fine.


Drinking these particular teas on an empty stomach would be a bigger issue; I just couldn't.  I'm having sticky rice and mango (with coconut sauce) with them for breakfast, more common as a Thai desert than a breakfast but definitely heavy food.


The Jing Mai seems to express more woodiness than spice this round, moving into an aged hardwood range instead of green wood; that's different.  Bitterness is still relatively moderate, in a nice balance.  All of this wouldn't be a personal favorite for character but it works for me.


The Jinggu is much nicer, transitioned quite a bit.  It's more on green wood now, well off the "kerosene" range, with mineral undertone moderated.  It seems sweeter.  The feel has some structure to it and the aftertaste remains as a bitterness and tightening across your mouth.  It comes across as decent tea; some of all that serves as a quality marker.  Next one might question if it's pleasant enough to be desirable, since quality should tie to what it liked, but what I mean gets complicated.  The tea is also clean flavored, well balanced, reasonably intense, a little sweet, etc., and the marker is just a clear and simple sign that ties in with some of the rest of that.  Or at least that's how I see it, but what do I know.  I'm self-taught related to my tea understanding so my teacher was radically uninformed.

The Xigui smoke effect is transitioning; funny that's going to be the review theme, what's going on with the smoke, versus the rest of the tea.  It's a bit heavier in tone, darker, less like the effect of stepping near a camp-fire or eating smoked bacon and more towards mineral range, like licking rusted iron pipe.  Maybe enough other range will show forward to actually review that next round.  It has more going on for balance, it's just hard to identify it beyond such a pronounced aspect that takes over.  Mineral is there.  Earthiness might be not so far from damp forest floor, or towards peat.  It's cleaner in effect than all that would sound; mustiness or sourness really kills the positive nature of experience in teas and although these aspects don't sound it they're clean.

Fourth infusion


I'm getting heat from my wife about getting on with errands before an outing with the kids; I might squeeze in two more rounds, hardly enough to tell the story of these teas, but enough to tell a lot of it.  I'll let these run for just over 10 seconds to try them out a little heavier, even though I'll probably end up talking about it being a bit much.  To me that's about seeing the tea from a slightly different angle.  It also ramps up the feel aspect, but it's not as if I wasn't able to notice that in these.  At least one of these teas is pretty strong related to drug-like effect (all relative; "notable" might work better, it's not that strong), or maybe it's just the overall combined effect.

The Jing Mai version is balancing green wood tone and spice, with good sweetness; it's nice.  The bitterness is a little strong brewed slightly longer, not optimum, for me.  The intensity is nice.  It's up there; the flavor and other balance hangs together well with a mouth-tightening feel after and plenty of lingering aftertaste.  I think the location and overall effect of the feel would shift in tea versions regarded as very high quality tea but I'm not trained enough to appreciate that anyway.

The Jinggu shares some aspect range with the Jing Mai tea since it's also a bit woody with spice range, the mix and overall effect is just different.  It's warmer, a little softer, with more towards an autumn leaf effect, with the first tea settled more into green wood.  The mineral range is quite different too, with the Jing Mai more on flinty or limestone underlying range, and this is much warmer, like an earthy version of clay.  I'm not saying the dirt was different in those ways for the plants to grow in but it does make you wonder what it was like.  The feel is a little softer in this version and the aftertaste takes on a different form and effect.  It's odd that Jing Mai version is on par for intensity and brightness, or even slightly brighter, being two years old versus brand new.  It's odd this tea is as soft as it is too; I'd expect a higher degree of edginess.

The smoke is finally not just transitioning but even giving way in the Xigui version.  Woodiness with a bright, edgy nature, like cured redwood, as the lawn furniture made of it would smell, is evenly mixed with the smoke.  Sweetness picked up; the balance is nicer.  The aftertaste is really pronounced at this slightly stronger brewed strength; it hangs around all of your mouth, with the taste just trailing off.  I think I'll do one more fast round to pass on final impressions; I really do have to do a few things before the standard afternoon outing with the kids.  I'm feeling a bit blasted anyway; it was enough.

Fifth infusion


The Jing Mai version is about the same, just different in experience brewed lightly, as I'd prefer it.  The Jinggu too; it's interesting how much the two overlap in spite of being quite different in other ways.    The Xigui is nice for now balancing smoke, a spicy range of woodiness, and elevated sweetness.  All three are nice, interesting, very different, in spite of the first two sharing some common ground.  Of course the teas weren't finished; I just stopped drinking them at that point and the notes leave off there.

This is exactly what one would hope to experience from a sample set:  a good bit of variation, some interesting overlap, and transitions across infusions that are interesting.  It's more typical to drink teas in a series, trying multiple infusions of each version in a row, stretching out the tasting process to lots of rounds covering a long period of time, not paired as infusions of several types round by round.  That allows for experiencing the drug-like effect better and removes the complication of sorting through multiple tea versions' aspects in single rounds.

For review the approach used here makes sense, except that few tea reviewers seem to agree with that assessment.  It's a lot to give up to not experience the "cha qi" drug-like effect of versions individually, for many, defeating a lot of the point of drinking better sheng.  It would feel less "busy" the other way too.  I don't really see myself as any sort of authority or role model, related to evaluating teas or communicating process issues; I just share what I experience in the forms that seem most natural.  For the most part others probably should and would try the teas one by one.


Temple outing


This temple outing, the one I mentioned we needed to get to, did actually contain a tea theme aspect, even though it wasn't about that.  I'll share a bit about what we did.  It was at Wat Pho, the local temple where we join the most events, where I was married in a Thai ceremony, where I ordained quite awhile back, and where Keoni became a novice monk this year (covered in posts here and here).


some sort of special event at Wat Pho


a monk preparing very good Tie Kuan Yin and Tie Luo Han; not how that usually goes


Kalani posing with a monk we know


offering coins at many stations for luck